Download Climber EA

Product already purchased, I paid in advance.
waiting for the fundraising to complete to distribute.

 

just a quick two months backtest, no settings tuning, just as a teaser

 

this is absolutely ok, but please add a comment that your screenshots are coming from different grid EA.

I understand that, but many people which use Google Translate will be very confused and think you are talking about Climber EA.
Which is not the case, since you haven't test it.

There is a parameter in Climber EA for max number of trades, it can be set even to 1.

Note: I don't say it is best EA of the world, I just say we cannot say that every EA which has a grid option is the same.

 

Backtest of Climber EA at M5 and max number of trades set to 3 (only)

 

max three grid trades only, during all backtest (year 2019)

 

But, I need to thank @BluePanther, since I was not even aware that with such reduced number of trades, EA performs reasonably well.
PS As with every EA, of course, need to be monitored, sometimes manual cut losses. nobody can just let it run and come after 12 months to take profit. Usual common sense.

 

you can have your opinion. but result just does not have to be the same.

look at my tests with max number of trades set to 3.

I respect you, and value your contribution, but in other thread in the forum, you claim different thing.

You use OxygenFX, which is also grid EA (!) on live account and posted very positive results



please stop spreading confusion.

 

and, to make sure - I don't claim you can use grid EA without any manual intervention. I would never do that.
but there are grid EA who can be profitable. Depends on the quality of the entries.
In this respect, there are significant differences
- some EA just take pure stochastic approach, without price analysis (like MoneyPile) and then use martingale. this type of EA is difficult to work and they will most likely blow your account (unless used in strong trending market)
- some EAs do try to make proper entries. For such EAs, if you set them up to cut losses at some drawdown level (e.g. 20%) and then restart them again, they can be profitable.

 

you haven't made your point clearly

and it was you that deviated from the thread.

but you are right, the conversation is over.

 

all clear.
I respect you for this.

PS I still see the off-topic posts here. maybe it is some timing issue. When they are gone, I will also remove my comments to avoid confusion.
I leave only my post underscoring that grid is dangerous technique, if not applied with caution. here we both agree, I guess.

 

sorry, no.
Main list is closed already (6 of 6).
we only waiting for remaining payments