Buy Sets for Optimal Titan X Performance

Hai All,
This the more detailed information about my sets files

First Comparison,
Please read this to the end so that you understand the contents and there is no misunderstanding on something.

I have doing an compare about my sets file with that newest blueedge sets files. Why? Cause I want to give you guys a reason why you should buy my sets. This EA is the one, Trust me if you use with the correct input settings you can make a passive from forex using this EA.

Here the things, i have doing strategy tester with the newest set files from official. I just tested for 3 sets files which is ; “57 Sets” “Plutus Sets” “EMA PAC WG100k Sets”. Why, i just compared it with just 3 sets of blueedge even though blueedge has 7 sets which might be better, I took these 3 as a sample, actually I compared 4 sets one named "EMA 14 Sets" but the results were bad so I didn't take that as our benchmark for comparison, because it would be unfair if we compare with sets that do not match ours. So I chose these 3 to be used as comparison material which in my opinion is commensurate with my set files, each of which gives almost the same results and can even be more than mine and also with these 3, it should be our benchmark for other blueedge file sets and also we save more time than doing too many comparisons by entering 3 other file sets.

This sets “57 Sets” “Plutus Sets” “EMA PAC WG100k Sets”. Is good (In Result) and i just shocked when results from “57 Sets” and “EMA PAC WG100K Sets” comes out because I didn't change anything in the input about lots. And the profit they gave is about to be same as my 2,5 Lots Results and 2,5 Lots of “Plutus Sets” Results in profits. Especially if I change the lots to 2,5 the robot will give more profit than my sets. But in this comparison we are not just discussing profit, but discussing all of its performance.

Okay that’s it about Blueedge New Sets result Compared to mine Sets file about the profits.

Now, lets talk about pros and cons about My sets and Blueedge sets report (In Profit, Maintain your account Balance, Long Term and Short Term Use)

Here you can take a look about the graph. There is “57 Sets” “Plutus Sets” “EMA PAC WG100k Sets” and My Sets File.



You can see the graph is on upside (Profit Side) which is great and we can assume all sets file is profitable.
Now you can see the result compared of the report files.



You can see the Bars and Ticks number is all the same, it means all sets is testing with the same date start and end. No cheating and such to show one of the sets files is superior to the other.

Now, the main thing about EA is we see for the Balance Drawdown Maximal, Equity Drawdown Maximal, Equity Drawdown Abolute, Balance Drawdown Absolute, Trade Frequency, Profit Factor and Recovery Factor.

First, for this 3 Sets from Blueedge they all is really good in Balance Drawdown maximal, Equity Drawdown maximal. They give us 8% to 12% in Balance Drawdown Maximal and 6% to 10% which is really small and good. But mine is no less good than that, even though My Maximal Balance and Equity Drawdown are slightly higher. But its still at 12-13% which is still small and good for our Account.

Second, The Profit Factor and Recovery Factor is all doing good which the higher numbers comes out with more good results.

The Last, Lets talk about the Trade Frequency, Equity Drawdown Abolute and Balance Drawdown Absolute. Which is Important for future trade. Now We can see all this 3 Sets from Blueedge, Have largest number in Maximal balance Absolute and Equity Absolute which is at 4k to 5k. From here you can see what will happen in your account when using this sets, your account can get loss maximum for about 4k or 5k. Maybe in a day or week as their Equity Protector settings the trade will continue in next week, so we can assume you can get 4k loses in one week.

The important thing. What the difference within Drawdown Maximal and Absolute Maximal. Drawdown maximal is calculate all trade that have exist in your account. Example : I doing a trade from July to December, so whenever you download a report of your account stats, you will see the Maximal Drawdown number and percentage there which means the maximum observed loss from a peak to a trough of a portfolio, before a new peak is attained. But maximal absolute is no less important than maximal drawdown, cause Maximal Absolute gives you foresight, regarding how much you lose per day or a trade. So from here we can assume that mine is more good at overall, even though in the percent Maximal Drawdown mine is a little bigger, but it's still in a small range for the size of an EA, which can be concluded the smaller the percentage of the maximum and Absolute maximum drawdown, the EA you use gives a little loss.

And now we talk about Trade Frequency.



Blueedge give you less frequency of trade so therefore they can have small drawdown. “57 Sets and EMA PAC WG100k Sets” have same frequency for total trade about 468 and “Plutus Sets” is more less at 178. Mine have much more frequency of trade which is at 1600, my sets is really good for short and long term without give you a risk for huge loss, cause create it to be stable and profitable. And the last is Profit and Loss Trade, you can see at the reports there, 3 Sets from Blueedge have 64 to 66% at profits and Loss Trade at 33 to 35%. Mine have 76% of Profits trade and have 23% of loss trade Which is more higher than all that 3 trades. if you think about it, these 3 sets of Blueedge give a small frequency trade but can only give a percentage of profit that is not as big as mine. If you remember that my frequency has far more trades of 1600 and blueedge is only 468 and also at 178. What should be if the setting is profitable he can give a higher percentage because the trade frequency is small. So we can conclude here Blueedge can give you huge profits in the best structure of market but can give you huge loses in bad structure of market, so you can’t use this for long term cause you must to see it going with the trade, is it at profit or not, cause if you think again about the Drawdown Absolute they gave, is so much big, which is in a trade you can loss huge money.

The very last thing again. Blueedge sets is designed you to success at Forex Funding Evaluation program, but remember again what I am saying before this sets files can give you huge loss in a trade maybe in a day or a week, considering that his equity protector amount is quite high and fixed, we don't have any calculations if we want to change lots to be in sync with the EP Amount. So this is really meant for those of you who have only 100k accounts and that still doesn't guarantee you success in trading. My Sets I have my own calculation and it have been tested for all lots from 0.01 0.1 1 and 10, the Equity Protector of mine can be vary adjusted to the lots we use.

Pros and Cons
My Sets :

Pros :

- Drawdown Absolute is really small so you don’t worry of your account to be blown

- Max DD is low too

- Has a High Frequency of trade so it will be no matter if you use it for short term or long term

- Less Risks and Good Profits

- Have accurate calculations for settings on Lots and Equity Protector amount

- Trailing Stop Loss, So you not worry about to touch the EP

- Really Easy to Use

- Have 2 Stop Loss , Trailing Stop Loss to secure profit and Equity Protector to maintain the trade to not go down to bottom, so the trade will be stop and continue in next day if its touch the EP but its rarely

Cons :

- Can’t guarantee to be able to provide a profit in the very near future like using 0.1 lots and get 2k a day, the sets can’t do that cause it designed to be stable not to be rich in a day


Blueedge Sets :

Pros :

- Give you huge profit in Short Term

- Maximal Drawdown is small

- Using 2 to 3 Entry Feature to open position so that the trade can open perfectly

- Long Term support but needs big account

- Profit Factor is big

Cons ;

- Can’t just changing lots to get the same result as default

- Absoulte Drawdown is big

- Less Frequency of Trade

- Not have an stop loss or trailing stop loss to secure your account drawdown

- Using Equity Protector as their Stop Loss

- Bad at minimizing risks if sometimes trade goes wrong


That’s it guys about my first comparison, maybe if you look at it, I made my sets look superior and good but remember, I customized this set file for 2 months and have done many stages of testing so that it can give pretty close to perfect results. I made it to be Stable, Maximizing Profits and Minimizing Loses. Not to get rich in a very fast time. The main goal of making these sets is stability. I can explain how the settings work if you agree and have bought this set, how is the entry, how is the stop loss etc. The problem with calculating the settings for EP is that I already have a guide to make it understandable, but I can't give you the guide now, because it's the secret of the EA key to work properly.

Here is The Report File :
Please login or register to view links


SOME Q&A
"There is Second Comparison after This Q&A Just scroll it down"


Question #1 from Deliery Forum 25/1/2023:

“Thanks for the detailed report. BUt you are approaching the files wrong. THis are meant to pass prop firm challenge. How they test it is at the start of the week they turned on the bot. and let it it either hit 10% profit or 4% loss for the week. if it losses 4% it goes next week. but i agree with your findings you seem to do well on longer term accounts. but this setiles are just really program to pass the challenge thats all.”

Answer #1 :

Hai bro, Yes i think i have mentioned it in my statement there. That the "Blueedge sets is designed you to success at Forex Funding Evaluation program".
But just like i said before, The Sets is really risky, it can give you huge profits in a day and huge loss too in a day, cause of they don't really thinking about long term used, they created this to success in a month so therefore this Blueedge Sets is risky. And I also think that if you are successful with this set in the 2 stages of the evaluation program, you will definitely still use this EA, right?. Maybe in the 2 stages you are successful but it doesn't guarantee that in the future your real account will have the same results as the evaluation stages.

Considering that these Sets (Blueedge Sets) do not use stop losses and trailing stops, only rely on the Equity Protector of 4% of your total account to close all trades automatically. So if your Equity Protector level is high, it can cause big losses. And the difference is mine, I use an Equity Protector and a Trailing Stop, which is my Equity Protector, there are calculations, to maximize how far the price will fall, before it returns to the trend according to our open position. and will close all trades if we open the wrong position by touching the Equity Protector. Example: EA open buy but the price direction is moving in the opposite direction or you could say the price is trending down, now I have calculated here so that our trade position can go down first, or we can assume that there is a slight reversal in the market before it goes up again, but if it is it continues to go down until it touches the Equity Protector, which means that our trade is in the wrong position, it should not be open buy, but open sell, but this incident rarely happens if you look at the test chart.

And the EP Amount is adjusted to the Lots we use. So there is a calculation, what balance is suitable for us to use with one Lots and what EP Amount is, there is a calculation already, so all you have to do is use it.

-Naqh

Question #2 from Delivery Forum 25/1/2023:

Thanks for the detailed analysis Naqh. Since your setfile is designed for long-term stability, do you have calculations worked out that would potentially keep the drawdown under the 5% daily drawdown rule if running your settings on a prop-firm challenge/live account? I assume this could be achieved by simply lowering the lot sizes used to trade which in turn would lower overall profit potential, but would keep you comfortably within prop firm perameters?

Answer #2 :

Haiii Bro,

My Sets can do it for live account.
I can set it, for a live account if you use it for long term needs, in fact it can also be short term but for the evaluation stage the target of 8% profit with one month I can't give you 100% sure. But if you use it for a live account without any benchmark time, I'm sure it will run smoothly. I have a calculation how come it's safe.

My set doesn't work for all brokers, guys, it doesn't work for (OCTAFX and FBS) The results is really bad there i have tested it and some function not working properly with that broker. For maximum results, use Pepperstone, but I've done a test on this FTMO broker, so just relax and the results are good. For the detailed report, I can give it maybe 7-8 hours later because I will try to do a tester with an interval of 1 year, so that we can see with a broader view of the monthly chart whether it is smooth or just flat or maybe even a loss. It takes approximately 7 hours to complete the testing, so please provide your specific account, such as your account size, 100K, 50K, 25K or 10K, so I can do the testing by providing detailed reports later and save more time. For the calculation of Equity Protector Amount and the use of lots, I already have it and it should be safe. but I try to use lots that I think are optimal for your account size. So please give me your account size

Question #3 from Delivery Forum 25/1/2023 :

If it could run safely on a prop firm live account, I’d be in for a group buy for your settings. Calculate the lots/settings based on a $100k and $200k account size as those are the most common. Thanks in advance.

Answer #3 :

Hai Guys,

I Use 100k as a benchmark and have setup the account in such a way as to look similar to the FTMO Swing account type which has 1:30 leverage.

Actually, from the 100K data report, we can see the overall results to be used as a reference for the 200K account, I mean the 200K account has a higher Daily Drawdown so that with that we can trade more freely and can use larger lots. Because the graph will remain the same but the difference is only in the calculation results, because the Lots we use can be higher so the results are also high and vice versa.


Here are 2 Data Reports that I got,
Please login or register to view links



So first I did a test using 1 Lots on a 100K account, So the results can be seen like this,
Has a Maximal Equity Drawdown at 6%, So just a little explanation, This Maximal Drawdown is calculated on the final result of our account , so it's not as a benchmark for us to see the monthly Drawdown, So 6% is 179,224.36 (Final Balance) * 6%, so meet 10 187.29 . For us to make a benchmark for the average drawdown maybe per day or week, we can see from the Absolute Drawdown Equity, Absolute Balance Drawdown and Largest loss trades.

And secondly I also do testing with 0.5 Lots so we can see the difference in terms of Drawdown as well, we make the benchmark as Lots which are really safe for 100K, I'm not saying 1 Lots isn't safe, but if you want something safer you can use it 0.5 Lots, as the account grows, the Daily Drawdown will definitely increase too, so we aim for stability but don't forget the profit too.

For calculations for using FTMO accounts, I have also prepared them, not too different from calculations for normal or standard accounts. Over time, you can open a new real account with the Pepperstone broker so that it is freer from rules like the Daily Drawdown.

I can't give the FTMO calculation here, I can give it after a purchase.
Actually for FTMO, our life is only in the Daily Drawdown, or you could say we have a 100K account but the original funds we got were actually only 5K, so I will use this 5K as a benchmark as a calculation for using Lots and determining the number to be entered in EP Amount too.

Hope you understand my explanation.
Here Some Pepperstone Broker Data Report that i have there is 0.01 Lots, 0.1 Lots, 0.05 Lots (3 Month) and 10 Lots. "The daily drawdown in the report here might be a bit high because, when doing this test I just want to see the Profit for each lot that was obtained by using different lots. Except for files with a starting balance of USD 200 that is in accordance with the calculations, if you want to use it with a start balance on a real account, the results will look more or less like that. And all Data Reports with testing for one year except for the 0.05 Lots file, which was only 3 months (because at that time I wanted to test it after seeing that there was a flat graph on the 1 year Data Report)



"But the end result was that the account continued to grow or profit without any problems."



That's it Guys.
Btw Thanks for the Response

Here is the link for Pepperstone Data Reports :
Please login or register to view links

-Naqh

 

Question #4 from Delivery Forum 26/1/2023:

Thanks for putting that together Naqh. Couple more questions for you on it.
1) Does your strategy only work on gold or have you tested other instruments/pairs as well?

2) If multiple people are running your settings on a prop firm live account, will everyone have the same entries and/or exits or will they differ based on when each person starts running the EA initially?

3) I assume in the testing, you are just having the EA run non-stop Sunday through Friday and then not having trades closed out over the weekend. Have you experimented with potentially improving results by only having the EA run with your settings on certain days of the week and/or specific times of each day? Or based on the strategy you have created with these settings it makes sense to just let it run all the time?

No rush on the responses. Thanks in advance once again.

Answer #4:

Hii bro,
Thanks For The Questions.

1. For now, I specially design this set file only for XAUUSD, Why?

Because I focused on developing the way he entered in one pair first so he could work optimally and also keep it stable in the long term, if in the long term it is stable we can conclude that for short term use it will also be stable. Btw can it be used on other pairs, like EURUSD etc ?, in my opinion, the results will not be optimal and can even be bad. Because I've never tested other pairs, the problem is that each pair should have a different structure, so we can't just use it for all pairs if we really want maximum results. And why did I choose XAUUSD? At that time, I thought about News, one of the components that can also have a big impact on the forex market. In my opinion, XAUUSD is not too much exposed to news compared to other major pairs, so I really minimize the impact of news. But don't worry, everything has been calculated which in my opinion is really optimal, from the calculations for your balance needs and the EP Amount setting for the final floating loss limit, we also have a Trailing Stop so you don't have to be afraid of losing profit moments.

So indeed, with just this one pair, if you are patient, I'm sure 1 year is enough for you to collect large amounts of money so that you open another branch in the standard account, so that with 2 accounts you can have 2x as much income as before. a little picture 0.1 Lots can already give 900 to 1K a month. So the key is just to be patient, you don't need to use too many pairs, because if you are in a hurry it's also not good, your account will actually be destroyed because you are pushing too hard for fast profits.

2. Okay, I think people will have a different entry and exit based on when they started their EA, But this setting should give a different entry because I used the entry feature which should make your entry not the same. I can't explain because it's a bit secret *one of the keys of this robot can have good performance. “I suggest if you want to start using EA with its settings, do it at the beginning of the month, to minimize if there is leftover news if you start in the middle of the month or the end of the month, and also don't start EA in the middle of the week, do it at the beginning of the week, like prepare EA starting from Sunday. so that EA will be able to immediately work fresh when the market opens.”.

3. Yes i do, I did the testing with the assumption that you are using an FTMO account with a swing type which does not have any restrictions for trading around News releases, holding of trades overnight and over the weekend, that's why I said in my previous statement I had setting up the account in such a way by changing the leverage also at 1:30 which is the rule for a SWING type account. But to be safe if you use a standard type of FTMO account that has these rules, you can make a request to FTMO via their email to change the account type so you don't have to worry anymore about having to close trades before the weekend ends.

View attachment 76716

But if you really can't do that, here I am attaching a 3-month data report. I just did this test and the results are also new, so it's not an old data report.

Why only 3 months? Because here I took a range of 1-3 months. which if you look at the following picture (Graph report from the FTMO testing server 0.5 Lots 1 year before)

View attachment 76717

In that area there are quite a few variations of the graph, some are flat and swooping up, some are down. Here I use it wishfully to see the worst options right away because we change my settings or add new inputs to the settings so that the robot can close trades on a predetermined day and a predetermined hour "Here I set the robot to close all trades or pause trade on thursday at 00:00". I did the data testing report for 3 months using 0.5 lots, so the maximum drawdown is not much different from the data report for 1 year if you want to see it with a wider view. From testing these 3 months, we can use it as a benchmark for future predictions regarding open positions and the results we will get in the following months by using new inputs which is this automatic close trade feature.

And this is the Data Report and Graph of that 3 Months picture.
Please login or register to view links

View attachment 76718

That's It, Hopefully that can answer your question.
Thanks for the question and Your participant about this offer. I Really appreciated that.
Feel Free to ask again btw.

-Naqh

First Hater from Delivery Forum 26/1/2023:

Dude you're trying to convince people to buy your setup. But also to add and warn many others do not buy any EA without a report from a live account eg Myfxbook.. All demo images and figures are unreliable. Most of the EAs sold on this site have a demo report that couldn't be more perfect. But you know that 99% of them are trash. Moreover, if it is really successful, the seller is still busy printing money from it, not having much time to write a long, thorough description of the EA just to bring back $ 200. It's too cheap compared to all these efforts.

My Answer:

Yeah man, Before I talk on this delivery forum, I talked to the admin first and said that this sounds like it would be funny, because I bought this EA here and want to sell the set of files that are still related to this EA.

If you think all these Data Reports can be manipulated in such a way as to make it look convincing, I'm sure you're talking like this because you're tired of looking for EA and the results are the same as trash, please fix your trust issue, I'm not forcing you to agree with my statement. But just imagine all the questions and the way I explained the working mechanism of my set of files should be able to make you understand what happened, not just by chance but because of the hard work to achieve that goal, and bro, this set of files is much more valuable than $300 if you want to know, why do I set a low price when the time that was lost 2 months ago. I have a goal to start a new account ASAP, so I dare to put a price of $300, to state this price I am half sincere and not, but I have a goal to start ASAP without wasting time.
It should be with all the data reports, my statement above is not just a coincidence but indeed my seriousness in responding to all questions about my sets files. I can explain how this EA will enter, how it takes profit, how to minimize drawdown, and I also make calculations for all of that, starting from your account balance requirements and how many lots are optimal for your account as well as the appropriate EP amount. with the use of your lots. All of this is not obtained by chance but is obtained by hard dedication for this robot to function properly. And one question for you, can you give data !?, on your statement that those who make EA only sell their EA to earn money, or harshly you say their EA is not that good to make them able to make money from their EA.
I'm not forcing you to agree to my offer, please take care of your own trust issues.

-Naqh

Note :
*I want to set the price at $300 backdays, but afterall I want to set it at $1k to give more value on it and btw if you guys don’t want to buy it its fine, I aimed to make it rare too, but if you buy it, welcome!.


Last Comparison cause I think all the data and report must be make you guys understand what is going on

Hi again all,
Maybe this is my last comparison about about compare to another EA and their Sets to proving that my sets its better.

I Have doing an compared again with another EA called "Golden Pickaxe" which is the number 1 ranking based on this website Please login or register to view links. (I Use Risk sets for Golden Pickaxe to Match my sets performance and btw their another sets can't be tested in my MT5 Strategy Tester it keep loading for so long)



They have nice graph and profit, but really bad at risk management. Let's just take a look here, i will give all data to prove what i say, and I'm not a bullshit like people out there and that one member here.

Here is the link
Please login or register to view links

You can see the data that i test for 2 years+ with "Golden Pickaxe" EA with 0.1 Lots (Start Balance 1500) and i compared to my Report 0.1 Lots with 1 year (Start Balance 1000). But my performance is more better, like the gap its so far man, "Golden Pickaxe" generated 13504.58 in 2 years+ and mine generated 10599.31 in a year. If we just see by number, "Golden Pickaxe" have 13k and mine is 10k, That EA is the winner but don't forget, look at the test date, the 13k profit was obtained from a span of 2 years and mine was only 1 year. So mine is better.



That's in terms of profit, this robot is quite stable, and if you look at the graph that dives straight up we can say it's stable.



but there is one thing that makes this robot quite lacking, is their drawdown and risk management (Btw please see again the compared data report above this picture, you will see the "Golden Pickaxe" have Max Equity Drawdown at 46% even the Max Balance Drawdown at 17%. If your balance can handle the floating it will be okay but if its not, you will see that 17% number will turn to 100% Maximum Balance Drawdown which is your account will gone). With official file sets from Golden Pickaxe, the drawdown generated on the trade is quite large, there is no floating loss limit set on the EA input even though they have a maximum drawdown setting on the EA input, but if you setting it, to maximize the drawdown at just 10% the robot's performance is unstable even more loss and the EA also takes a while to recover to the breakeven point. Without stop loss or floating loss limit the EA will always run or not close the order while the account still has a balance. I will show you a detailed graph of MT5 which I think is very dangerous. Because the floating loss is quite high, if the account is not monitored all the balances can run out.



You can see that Equity Floating Peak, Peak #1 has 3,356 Floating Loss active, in that peak the balance is at 4320.11. Peak #2 has 5,383 Floating Loss active, in that peak the balance is at 11570.82.



By here i think you must understand what i mean. Just imagine what will happen if your account can't handle that floating loss and think it again i just using 0.1 lots and the Equity Gap is that big. Btw you can see the detail of the data like the balance and equity, inside the excel file called "Graph Detail Pickaxe" (Just click the peak button after you open the excel file if the button not working you can scroll it down and find the column that have yellow fill color).

Compared to my sets, mine have better performance bro, the drawdown is really small, the profits is good too, the risk management is all set, I have the calculation and has been carefully designed to minimize loss and maximize the profits. So you will be don't worry about your account get blown. And from my Sets performance Graph, you can see that it is very natural, there are flat charts, some are down and some are up. From there you should be able to conclude everything. And there doesn't seem to be an equity gap like in the "Golden Pickaxe" EA. For the worst case that will happen to the market, everything has been tested and calculated. Nothing comes by accident, everything is based on test and data. That's it, for the comparison between my sets with another EA which is ranked 1st based on the website.

I hope you all understand what I'm saying,
Thanks in Advance, for your time guys.

-Naqh

 

Let's make this,
UP!!!

 

Hi all,
I want to fix a photo related to the GRAPH comparison on the first comparison about this sets “57 Sets” “Plutus Sets” “EMA PAC WG100k Sets” and My Sets File,
I entered the wrong photo, sorry.



Thanks in Advance guys.
- Naqh

 

up

 

One thousand dollars for set files lmao, does this set files follow market conditions constantly changing or no, you expect us to pay 1k for sets that may stop working in matter of seconds, and this is not rated as scam Jesus, this forum is starting to look like the classic forex frame buy mine it's the same but I'm telling you it's better, I haven't got any product that is profitable over my 3 years here,!

 

One way to find out, Its to buy it.
I don't force you to agree with all my statement. All EA's is trash without the best settings, try to learn about the inputs of EA you have and Sets it, don't be a lazy that want something fast by just buying stuff.

Hope you get your "Best EA".

 

I'm in. Hope we can get enough participants

 

I will create a telegram group once the fundraising is complete, so that communication can be more efficient.
The link will be provided on the delivery conversation.

I forgot to say in my previous statement, that this offer includes the EA too,
So you will get both, EA's and Sets.

Thanks in Advance all.

 

Up

 

Many EAs purchased will not be used, and professional backtesting is required. strongly support

 

@Please login or register to view links Please advise

 

Hi
i was with blueedge 4 months ago for 1 month and probably 1 of the rare persons to be refund !
during this time i always use the "best" set file number one in the dashboard and the "help" of the coach
all that make me not be able to success even 1 challenge
Like say Naqh it is big win one day and the other EP reach !
i was very disappointed because the main response was to try and adapt by myself !

I am impress by the work done here, that i was not able to do because it take so much time

Well done

 

is what we need

 

with the EA will be we able to do our own continued testing? To see if we can further enhance the sets while making use of your excellent work of course!

 

Hi,
Yes, you can customize the settings again.
By Purchasing the product here, you will get:
- Titan X MT5 EA
- Official Blueedge Sets Files
- My Sets Files.


You can still change the settings, but the settings that I got and along with the calculations are the most optimal at the moment.
But I'm not holding you back, if you want to do more experiments.
Thanks in Advance.

 

Up,
Trust me this is the one, The sets files he give with all compared data looks really good.
This guy not a bullshit, Lets get it guyss

 

Looks very promising, nice work. Remember people the EA is also included. Up.

 

Hi all,
Before i speak, Thanks for people who have participate in this purchase. I Appreciated that.
Here the thing,
I've looked at some of the EA threads here, many people are very interested in Prop Firms and EA with Fast and High Profits, also many are interested in the input settings in EA.

I know Propfarming is indeed very tempting for you, by buying a cheap account to get a large real account by going through several stages before getting a real account. But remember, an EA designed to be fast like that won't last long in the forex market, trust me. Maybe a few months later EA will destroy your account.


Oh yeah btw this is for the input settings from the one on Titan X, after seeing some EA's in a recent thread like "waka-waka and what I heard recently is that there is a trustfx ea" the contents of their input are almost the same, but Titan X EA has a lot more to it than that and is more structured, Titan X has Entry settings, DD management which functions to hold your account from reaching DD, There are Stop Loss settings too, there are lots of them and it's really easy to experiment with, its different from other EA's that don't have a guide on EA's they give so that it is difficult to understand the parameters in the Input.
For details, this is a screenshot of the input on the Titan X.











I'm not forcing you to agree with my statement, but think before you act don't spend your money on something that doesn't work for you, remember time is expensive.

IMPORTANT:
The settings in this photo are the default settings from Titan X, so they are not the settings you will use after getting the set files from me.

Thank you all for your attention, I'll see you all in the telegram group after the purchased completed.

-Naqh