What's new
By:
Joint purchases club

Clubbingbuy.com — a platform for joint purchases of information products, where you can get access to the best courses, books and materials for minimal money!

Recruitment of participants Titany Trading Mastery Elite – Tommaso Nardini

Titany Trading Mastery Elite – Tommaso Nardini
0.00 star(s) 0 ratings

Log in or register now.
chillstep said:
There is math specific to Forex that he teaches..
It's high quality infomation
Click to expand...
this is the translation of one of the reviews found on Trustpilot


"The Review of a Trader with 13 Years of Experience
Let me preface this by saying that this is not the review of some poor beginner who openly admits, with phrases like “I don’t understand anything about trading or technology.” This is the review of a trader with 13 years of experience, and I’ll explain why I believe this is one of the worst software products currently on the market.
The underlying reason is simple: it is mathematically designed to lose money (with 100% certainty) over the medium term. It is based on an utterly outdated concept: that “since two markets are correlated (inversely, in this case), when one goes up and the other down, sooner or later this gap will close, and this convergence will generate the points needed to close the trade in profit.”
This assumption is probably the worst possible in trading. In reality, even correlated prices can move not just dozens, but thousands of points when the market is strongly trending without retracement.
This mechanism is "managed" with a generic stop loss on account equity, supposedly “to avoid blowing up the account,” as they claim. But this stop loss, based on the conservative parameters they recommend, has a risk-to-reward ratio of over 1:100 between a single trade (the one they showcase with their flashy screenshots and endless videos) and the inevitable stop (which, again, will mathematically be hit).
After blowing up accounts, they released a second version: this one includes a volatility filter and a time filter. According to them, this has made the software “one of the best in Europe” (the founder’s megalomania is nothing short of embarrassing). But we’re back to square one: you can add all the filters you want, but prices can bypass them with smart moves—as clearly proven when I launched the “powerful new best-in-Europe version,” and the software instantly hit stop loss.
The logic behind this software is like trading a very volatile market, waiting for an extreme overbought signal, and opening a tiny position with, say, a 3-point target and a 300-point stop. Sure, you’ll often hit the small target, and the usual snake oil salesman will show a demo account with a long winning streak… but he’ll conveniently hide the fact that after 40 winning trades earning you €400, you’ll hit a stop and lose €1,000—again, with 100% mathematical certainty.
Next nonsense: the results they show, like making €1,000 in one day. This is done by pushing their demo accounts to risk levels 10x or more than recommended. If the bot randomly catches a few big trades and miraculously avoids disaster—SNAP! Screenshot taken, video shot from a mansion in some tropical country, and boom: they’re selling you the dream of guaranteed wealth.
Another major sales pitch: “With our software you’ll pass prop firm challenges” because they randomize the trades so every user gets different entries. FALSE. Prop firms, even if trades are randomized, will still ban you, because no serious fund paying traders for real skills is going to pay hundreds of unskilled users running lottery-ticket bots like this. Not even grid bots, martingales, hedging bots, or anything of the sort.
They claim only 1 in 10 clients gets banned—just a cover story for when the user gets banned (if they haven’t already blown the account on their own), for copy trading. Then they’ll say, “We warned you someone gets banned from time to time,” and conveniently, it’ll be you.
Final act of megalomania from the cheerful founder (yes, he’s charismatic and a great salesman, even if a terrible trader): they claim they’re developing a software (the only one in Europe, no less!) that lets you change the license number on your own to use it wherever you want. Well, dear founder, while you’re working on that, there are dozens of platforms that have done this for decades. Maybe don’t waste too much time—ask a programmer, and in 5 minutes, he’ll generate your “mega system.”
In conclusion: if you want to be banned from a prop firm with mathematical certainty, or if you want to hook this thing up to your own account and lose (a lot of) money—again, with absolute mathematical certainty in the medium term—then you’ve come to the right place. Otherwise, avoid them like the plague and have fun watching their webinars full of clients who look like they’re ready to set them on fire."



I don't know him and I've never bought anything from him, but judging by his ads, it seems clear to me that he says things that make no sense.
 
falcorest said:
this is the translation of one of the reviews found on Trustpilot


"The Review of a Trader with 13 Years of Experience
Let me preface this by saying that this is not the review of some poor beginner who openly admits, with phrases like “I don’t understand anything about trading or technology.” This is the review of a trader with 13 years of experience, and I’ll explain why I believe this is one of the worst software products currently on the market.
The underlying reason is simple: it is mathematically designed to lose money (with 100% certainty) over the medium term. It is based on an utterly outdated concept: that “since two markets are correlated (inversely, in this case), when one goes up and the other down, sooner or later this gap will close, and this convergence will generate the points needed to close the trade in profit.”
This assumption is probably the worst possible in trading. In reality, even correlated prices can move not just dozens, but thousands of points when the market is strongly trending without retracement.
This mechanism is "managed" with a generic stop loss on account equity, supposedly “to avoid blowing up the account,” as they claim. But this stop loss, based on the conservative parameters they recommend, has a risk-to-reward ratio of over 1:100 between a single trade (the one they showcase with their flashy screenshots and endless videos) and the inevitable stop (which, again, will mathematically be hit).
After blowing up accounts, they released a second version: this one includes a volatility filter and a time filter. According to them, this has made the software “one of the best in Europe” (the founder’s megalomania is nothing short of embarrassing). But we’re back to square one: you can add all the filters you want, but prices can bypass them with smart moves—as clearly proven when I launched the “powerful new best-in-Europe version,” and the software instantly hit stop loss.
The logic behind this software is like trading a very volatile market, waiting for an extreme overbought signal, and opening a tiny position with, say, a 3-point target and a 300-point stop. Sure, you’ll often hit the small target, and the usual snake oil salesman will show a demo account with a long winning streak… but he’ll conveniently hide the fact that after 40 winning trades earning you €400, you’ll hit a stop and lose €1,000—again, with 100% mathematical certainty.
Next nonsense: the results they show, like making €1,000 in one day. This is done by pushing their demo accounts to risk levels 10x or more than recommended. If the bot randomly catches a few big trades and miraculously avoids disaster—SNAP! Screenshot taken, video shot from a mansion in some tropical country, and boom: they’re selling you the dream of guaranteed wealth.
Another major sales pitch: “With our software you’ll pass prop firm challenges” because they randomize the trades so every user gets different entries. FALSE. Prop firms, even if trades are randomized, will still ban you, because no serious fund paying traders for real skills is going to pay hundreds of unskilled users running lottery-ticket bots like this. Not even grid bots, martingales, hedging bots, or anything of the sort.
They claim only 1 in 10 clients gets banned—just a cover story for when the user gets banned (if they haven’t already blown the account on their own), for copy trading. Then they’ll say, “We warned you someone gets banned from time to time,” and conveniently, it’ll be you.
Final act of megalomania from the cheerful founder (yes, he’s charismatic and a great salesman, even if a terrible trader): they claim they’re developing a software (the only one in Europe, no less!) that lets you change the license number on your own to use it wherever you want. Well, dear founder, while you’re working on that, there are dozens of platforms that have done this for decades. Maybe don’t waste too much time—ask a programmer, and in 5 minutes, he’ll generate your “mega system.”
In conclusion: if you want to be banned from a prop firm with mathematical certainty, or if you want to hook this thing up to your own account and lose (a lot of) money—again, with absolute mathematical certainty in the medium term—then you’ve come to the right place. Otherwise, avoid them like the plague and have fun watching their webinars full of clients who look like they’re ready to set them on fire."



I don't know him and I've never bought anything from him, but judging by his ads, it seems clear to me that he says things that make no sense.
Click to expand...
Makes no sense to people with no clue
 
chillstep said:
Makes no sense to people with no clue
Click to expand...
My opinion is that those who have a system that works don't sell it. And the better the system works, the less likely it is to be made public.
From my point of view, these systems are mirages that attract people who have no idea how markets work, what bots are, the basics of statistics, how to spot skewed backtest data, etc., etc., etc.

But, as they say in Australia, opinions are like assholes—everyone's got one.
 
falcorest said:
My opinion is that those who have a system that works don't sell it. And the better the system works, the less likely it is to be made public.
From my point of view, these systems are mirages that attract people who have no idea how markets work, what bots are, the basics of statistics, how to spot skewed backtest data, etc., etc., etc.

But, as they say in Australia, opinions are like assholes—everyone's got one.
Click to expand...
ahahah

As I said, allegedly he sold one of his system for millions to a bank. So for this GB's low pledge amount I want to see and try his course.

BTW yes, no-one would give away his million dollar trading system for $1000 but each "golden nudget" from each trading course you watch, adds up with time. You could end up building your own trading system or method, that works for you.
 
QuantTraderX said:
ahahah

As I said, allegedly he sold one of his system for millions to a bank. So for this GB's low pledge amount I want to see and try his course.

BTW yes, no-one would give away his million dollar trading system for $1000 but each "golden nudget" from each trading course you watch, adds up with time. You could end up building your own trading system or method, that works for you.
Click to expand...
He sold so many "algorithms" to banks and hedge funds that he is still advertising his course through youtube and has the face to come and say "Get my Robot" with those yellow and cringy teeth... disgusting to me, sorry. We should buy him a trip for turkey or albania not that we are trying to buy his "course" lol
 
He teaches as many other traders do. If his course would make me profitable I don't care if he teaches trading or sells bots lol

If I get from his course even only 1 golden nugget, the $16 instead of thousands are good spent.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom