Fundraising Roulette System ALL-6 (english)

its all explained in the manual, believe me, its a unique method

 

The problem is not progressive betting or martingale...the problem most people fail to grasp is to have good money management of your bankrool and a strategy with EDGE. I wont even go on Physics and how you can basically predict to almost 99% of certain where the ball will land. Progressive betting works....i have the numbers from various real roulettes, more than 10million spins, and i have backtested every strategy. It works...depending on the player and his strat.

 

If you mix this strat with the other one...its just a matter of having the patience to follow the systems and bag the money. cmon guys join in.

 

Even with the current best physics, a 99% rate is not attainable. Plus of course this strategy doesn't even do that.
Progressive betting works until it doesn't and your account is blown. Progressive betting doesn't change the probability. Unless you have an edge in the ability to predict where the ball lands on the wheel, progressive betting is worthless. You can't predict where the ball will land based on previous spins. Each spin is independent of the last. The wheel has no "memory" of the previous spins.
Casinos love these systems.

 

This strategy involves methodically tracking wins and losses, increasing bets after losses, and switching groups if necessary. The goal is to find a balanced betting pattern that adapts based on outcomes, giving a structured approach to betting progression.

 

And like I said, each outcome of the wheel is independent from the previous. Switching groups is pointless. Basic probability. The casino will win long term regardless.

 

Alright, then you don't need to be in this group since it seems pointless for you. For everyone else, I'll continue to share my successes. As we all know and it's been explained before the player doesn't have an edge in this game, the house has the advantage. But it's for those who enjoy it and believe there are ways to make money consistently, even if it's through the luck of finding the right method or approach.

 

I wont dwelve on how you can beat the casinos since you know everything and have a stubborn point of view on life and on things. The house edge can be beaten and even give edge to the player on specific conditions, i have meet professional roulette players and dwell on the roulettecomputer forum for more than 20 years so i know what i am talking about.

If you dont like this get the fuck out of this thread.

 

I've explained what those conditions are--predicting where the ball will land based on the physics of motion. There is no other way. That includes any sort of betting scheme or tracking what numbers/colors the ball landed on in the past. Each spin is independent of the past ones and no betting scheme will change that or the house edge.

 

There are some mathmatical aproaches to roullete that have an edge and consistently beat it....specially based on numbers not seen, pretty basic but it works.

 

Nope. Numbers or colors not seen is irrelevant. The wheel doesn't "remember" what happened in previous spins. If red comes up 10 times in a row, the odds that red or black will come up on the next spin is exactly the same. Easily proven with a record of the spins.

 

Prove to me then...10million spins on real roulette. go get the numbers then we talk.

 

The maximum that went out was 22 in Mont Carlo...the statistic is 19 numbers in a row around 70K spins....dont tell me you wont get profits until it its!

 

Let's not turn this into a debate. I don’t disagree with the criticisms about roulette—it's true that there’s no mathematical advantage that can predict the next outcome. A roulette system is simply a guide that offers a strategy to improve one’s chances of success. However, its effectiveness also depends on the player’s approach. It's important to stay patient when facing a negative outcome and resist the urge to increase bets impulsively.

Below is my spreadsheet showing the completion of one game cycle for this strategy. You’ll see several losing spins, but the goal is to achieve a 60-unit profit to complete the cycle. This is all I’ll share; I’ve run this many times, and it has a strong approach for reaching this target with a stop in place. Using 300 units to make 60+ units per game seems like a reasonable risk-reward ratio for roulette, especially since this strategy offers some statistical edge for the player.

 

Very nice...the excell also is shared with the system? If not can you share it in the delivery department? Thank you in advance

 

i will speak with admin but likely i will do

 

No betting system offers a statistical edge in roulette.

Gamblers Fallacy: the mistaken belief that a random event is more likely to happen in the future because it has occurred less frequently than expected. It's also known as the Monte Carlo fallacy or the fallacy of the maturity of chances.

You will lose the same house edge percentage on your bets no matter what sort of betting scheme you do.
It might even seem like you could win with this sort of system:
Wait until 4 red or black come up in a row, then bet on the opposite. If you lose, double your bet each time until you win.
Unfortunately it doesn't work. Anyone with a basic understanding of probability knows why. There's even a name for it: gamblers fallacy. Look it up.

 

I just completed this, it was purely to show for here using a £30 bank 300 units £0.10p starting with 2 units £0.20p this game completed exactly on 60units with a positive 1 identifier

 

Game history attached

 

this morning another game completed